Drone Laws in Texas: The Criminal and Civil Consequences of Operating Drones

What are Drones? A drone is an unmanned aerial vehicle or “UAV.” They are commonly operated remotely and often carry audio and video recording equipment. Drones are becoming increasingly popular for recreational and non-recreational purposes. This article focuses on drone laws in Texas and the criminal and civil liabilities a recreational operator might run into in Texas. Who […]

Drone Laws in Texas: The Criminal and Civil Consequences of Operating Drones Read More »

The Age of Criminal Responsibility in Texas: A Look at House Bill 122

What is the Age of Criminal Responsibility in Texas? In Texas, 17-year-olds can’t vote, serve on a jury, play lotto, or buy beer and cigarettes – but they are considered adults when they get in trouble with the law. Some Texas lawmakers are hoping to change that. House Bill 122 , which would raise the

The Age of Criminal Responsibility in Texas: A Look at House Bill 122 Read More »

cell site tower

Sims v. State: Can Police Obtain Real-Time Cell Site Location Without Warrant?

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals recently went to great lengths to explain how it came to decision with a different result than the United States Supreme Court in Carpenter v. U.S. In Sims v. State, the Court of Criminal Appeals determined a search warrant was not required when using real-time cell site location information

Sims v. State: Can Police Obtain Real-Time Cell Site Location Without Warrant? Read More »

What’s the Difference Between a Federal Criminal Complaint & Indictment?

  Federal Criminal Complaint & Indictment While most offenses people hear about in the movies or the news involve state crimes such as murder , burglary, drug possession, and the like, the U.S. Government prosecutes many crimes federally. Common offenses prosecuted by the feds include drug possession, child pornography, wire fraud, Medicaid fraud, and selling

What’s the Difference Between a Federal Criminal Complaint & Indictment? Read More »

excessive fines

Timbs v. Indiana: SCOTUS Boot on the Throat of Policing for Profit?

The Supreme Court, in Timbs v. Indiana, recently handed down a unanimous decision that may be the death knell for “policing by profit,” limiting both police and prosecutors across the country. The Court held that the Eighth Amendment protection against excessive fines, including forfeiture of property, applies to states. This holding will limit asset forfeiture

Timbs v. Indiana: SCOTUS Boot on the Throat of Policing for Profit? Read More »

Reviews
About
Call
Schedule
Search