Clickcease

Contents

›››

    Table of Contents

      Varghese Summersett Background

      Dallas Felony DWI With A Deadly Weapon

      What Is a Felony DWI With a Deadly Weapon Charge in Dallas?

      A DWI with a deadly weapon charge occurs when prosecutors allege you drove your vehicle in a manner capable of causing death or serious bodily injury while intoxicated. In Texas, a motor vehicle is not automatically considered a deadly weapon. The state must prove your driving was reckless or dangerous to attach this enhancement. This distinction can mean the difference between standard DWI penalties and mandatory prison time with parole restrictions.

      Under Texas Penal Code § 1.07(a)(17) , a deadly weapon includes anything that in the manner of its use is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury. When applied to DWI cases, this requires specific evidence of dangerous driving behavior beyond simply being intoxicated behind the wheel.

      If you’re facing a DWI with deadly weapon allegations in Dallas, Fort Worth, or anywhere in North Texas, contact Varghese Summersett immediately. Our team includes former prosecutors and Board Certified criminal defense specialists who have handled hundreds of complex DWI cases.

      How Does a Vehicle Become a “Deadly Weapon” in Texas DWI Cases?

      Texas courts apply a specific legal test to determine whether a vehicle qualifies as a deadly weapon. The analysis focuses on how you drove, not simply whether an accident occurred. According to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Couthren v. State (2019), the state must present evidence that your driving was reckless or dangerous at the time of the alleged offense.

      Courts look for specific indicators of dangerous driving:

      • Speeding significantly above the posted limit
      • Running red lights or stop signs
      • Weaving between lanes or crossing into oncoming traffic
      • Failing to maintain control of the vehicle
      • Nearly striking other vehicles or pedestrians
      • Causing property damage through erratic driving
      • Failing to yield right of way

      A collision alone does not automatically support a deadly weapon finding. The state needs additional evidence showing how the intoxication affected your actual driving behavior.

      What Are the Penalties for DWI With a Deadly Weapon Finding in Texas?

      A deadly weapon finding dramatically increases the consequences of a felony DWI conviction. Under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 42A.054, a deadly weapon finding triggers several mandatory penalties that judges cannot waive.

      Learn more: Meet our Dallas Criminal Defense Attorneys

      Third degree felony in Texas

      For a third-degree felony DWI with deadly weapon finding, you face 2 to 10 years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. You must serve at least half of your sentence before becoming eligible for parole. This means a minimum of one year in prison before any possibility of release, even with good behavior. Standard felony DWI without a deadly weapon finding allows parole eligibility much sooner.

      Beyond prison time, a deadly weapon finding appears on your permanent criminal record. This notation follows you through every background check, affecting employment opportunities, professional licensing, and housing applications for the rest of your life.

      What Case Law Shapes Dallas DWI Deadly Weapon Cases?

      Texas courts have developed clear standards through several key decisions. Understanding how judges apply these precedents helps evaluate the strength of the state’s case against you.

      In Sierra v. State, police conducted a thorough investigation and determined the defendant was speeding based on physical evidence at the scene. The court found sufficient evidence of dangerous driving to support the deadly weapon finding, even without eyewitness testimony of the actual driving behavior.

      The Moore v. State decision involved a defendant who rear-ended one vehicle with enough force to push it into another car. The court found evidence of failing to brake or braking too late demonstrated the vehicle was used in a manner capable of causing serious injury.

      In Tyra v. State, the court noted that evidence showing a defendant was too intoxicated to control their vehicle could demonstrate the recklessness required for a deadly weapon finding.

      Facing a DWI charge in North Texas? Get experienced defense now.

      The attorneys at Varghese Summersett have secured dismissals, reductions, and not-guilty verdicts in DWI cases across Dallas, Tarrant, Collin, and Denton counties. Call 214-903-4000 for a free case evaluation.

      Why Did the Court Reject the Deadly Weapon Finding in Couthren v. State?

      The Couthren case illustrates exactly what prosecutors must prove and where their arguments can fail. In June 2012, Donald Ray Couthren II struck a pedestrian while driving on a frontage road near Bryan, Texas. The pedestrian had stepped into the roadway while walking home from a bar. Despite the serious injuries sustained, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ultimately rejected the deadly weapon finding.

      dallas dwi with a deadly weapon

      The court’s reasoning focused on what evidence was missing. Officers testified that Couthren appeared intoxicated with slurred speech and swaying. He admitted to drinking two Four Loko beverages. The victim suffered six broken ribs, a broken leg, and a possible concussion. Yet none of this proved how Couthren was actually driving when the collision occurred.

      Police never investigated brake marks or skid patterns. No witness observed the driving behavior. Officers did not testify about the speed limit on that road. The only evidence about speed came from Couthren himself, who said he was driving approximately 30 mph.

      The court distinguished this from cases like Moore, where physical evidence demonstrated the defendant was traveling fast enough to cause a chain-reaction collision. Without similar evidence of speeding, failure to brake, or other dangerous driving conduct, the deadly weapon finding could not stand.

      Can Prosecutors Use Post-Accident Conduct to Prove Deadly Weapon?

      In Couthren, prosecutors tried an alternative argument. They claimed his decision to drive home before taking the victim to a hospital, combined with driving with a cracked windshield, showed reckless behavior supporting the deadly weapon finding.

      The Court of Criminal Appeals disagreed. While those decisions might have been poor judgment, they occurred after the collision. The deadly weapon analysis must focus on how the vehicle was being used at the time of the offense. Subsequent driving, even if arguably reckless, does not retroactively make the vehicle a deadly weapon during the initial incident.

      The court also noted that only the passenger side of the windshield was damaged. The driver’s side remained clear enough for normal operation. This undercut the prosecution’s argument about dangerous post-accident driving.

      What Defenses Work Against DWI Deadly Weapon Charges?

      Effective defense strategies challenge the state’s ability to prove dangerous or reckless driving. Several approaches have proven successful in North Texas courts.

      Challenging the investigation itself often reveals gaps. Did officers measure skid marks? Did they document the speed limit? Did they interview witnesses about driving behavior? Missing evidence can create reasonable doubt about how the defendant was actually driving.

      Expert testimony can also undermine the state’s case. Accident reconstruction specialists can analyze physical evidence and demonstrate alternative explanations for a collision. Medical experts can address whether injuries are consistent with the alleged dangerous driving.

      Constitutional challenges may apply as well. If officers obtained evidence through an illegal stop or improper interrogation, that evidence may be suppressed. Without key pieces of their case, prosecutors may be unable to prove the deadly weapon element.

      Frequently Asked Questions About Dallas DWI Deadly Weapon Charges

      Does a car accident during a DWI automatically mean deadly weapon charges?

      No. Texas courts have consistently held that a collision while intoxicated does not automatically support a deadly weapon finding. The state must present separate evidence that your driving behavior was reckless or dangerous. An accident can happen even when someone is driving normally if another factor, like a pedestrian stepping into traffic, causes the collision.

      What is the difference between felony DWI and DWI with deadly weapon?

      A felony DWI (third or subsequent offense) carries serious penalties on its own. Adding a deadly weapon finding increases those penalties significantly. The main practical difference is parole eligibility. With a deadly weapon finding, you must serve at least half your sentence before becoming parole-eligible. Without it, parole eligibility comes much sooner.

      Can deadly weapon findings be challenged on appeal?

      Yes. Appeals courts regularly review whether sufficient evidence supported a deadly weapon finding. The Couthren case itself was an appeal that successfully challenged the finding. If the trial record lacks evidence of dangerous driving behavior, an appellate court may reverse the deadly weapon portion of the judgment.

      How does a deadly weapon finding affect my criminal record?

      A deadly weapon finding is permanently noted in your judgment of conviction. This notation appears on background checks and cannot be expunged or sealed under current Texas law. Employers, landlords, and licensing boards will see this designation when reviewing your criminal history.

      Should I hire a lawyer for DWI deadly weapon charges?

      Given the severe consequences, experienced legal representation is essential. A skilled defense attorney can identify weaknesses in the state’s evidence, file appropriate motions to suppress improperly obtained evidence, retain expert witnesses, and negotiate with prosecutors. The difference between a deadly weapon finding and its absence can mean years of additional incarceration.

      Arrested for DWI With Deadly Weapon in Dallas? Contact Varghese Summersett.

      The defense team at Varghese Summersett brings decades of combined experience to every DWI case. Our attorneys include former prosecutors who understand how the state builds these cases and where their arguments are vulnerable. We have Board Certified criminal law specialists who focus exclusively on serious felony defense.

      With offices in Fort Worth, Dallas, Houston, and Southlake, we represent clients throughout North Texas in state and federal courts. Our team has earned more than 1,100 five-star client reviews by delivering results and treating every client with respect.

      For a free and confidential consultation about your DWI deadly weapon case, call 214-903-4000 or contact us online. We answer calls 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

      Benson Varghese is the founder and managing partner of Varghese Summersett, where he has built a distinguished career championing the underdog in personal injury, wrongful death, and criminal defense cases. With over 100 jury trials in Texas state and federal courts, he brings exceptional courtroom experience and a proven record with Texas juries to every case.

      Under his leadership, Varghese Summersett has grown into a powerhouse firm with dedicated teams across three core practice areas: criminal defense, family law, and personal injury. Beyond his legal practice, Benson is recognized as a legal tech entrepreneur as the founder of Lawft and a thought leader in legal technology.

      Benson is also the author of Tapped In, the definitive guide to law firm growth that has become essential reading for attorneys looking to scale their practices.

      Benson serves as an adjunct faculty at Baylor Law School.

      Related Articles

      Fort Bend County DWI Lawyer

      Adrian Peterson Arrested for DWI: How to Defend DWI and UCW Charges

      Former Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson was recently arrested and charged with two offenses: Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) and…

      Chris Brown & Crew _ The Legal Challenges Ahead

      Chris Brown Accused of Assault: What Legal Challenges Lie Ahead

      R&B singer Chris Brown is embroiled in yet another legal controversy, this time facing a $50 million lawsuit for alleged…

      massage parlor raids in Texas

      Massage Parlor Raids in Texas: Charges & Penalties

      Massage parlor raids in Texas have become increasingly common as law enforcement agencies target businesses suspected of prostitution, solicitation, and…